Table 5 Literature comparison
Bacteria species | Biomass status | Chemical | Concentration | Initial PHA content | Purity | Recovery | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
E. coli(rec) | Frozen | NaOH | 0.1 | 77% | 91% | 90% | Choi and Lee (1999) |
E. coli | Frozen | SDS | 0.5% | 77% | 98% | 87% | Choi and Lee (1999) |
E. coli | Frozen | NH4OH | 0.1 | 77% | 85% | 95% | Choi and Lee (1999) |
E. coli | Frozen | H2SO4 | 0.1 | 77% | 79% | 87% | Choi and Lee (1999) |
C.necator | Lyophilized | NaOH | 0.1 | 38% | 97% | 97% | |
C.necator | Lyophilized | NaOH | 0.1 | 60% | 80% | 90% | Anis et al. (2012) |
C.necator | Lyophilized | NH4OH | 0.1 | 60% | 60% | 62% | Anis et al. (2012) |
Comamonas | Lyophilized | NaOH | 0.05 | 34% | 89% | 97% | |
R.eutropha | Lyophilized | NaOH | N.D. | 70% | 78% | 45% | Yang et al. (2011) |
R.eutropha | Lyophilized | SDS | 5% | 70% | 90% | 81% | Yang et al. (2011) |
R.eutropha | Lyophilized | SDS | 1% | 50% | 87% | N.D. | Ramsay et al. (1990) |
P.putida | Lyophilized | NaOH | 0.1 | 20% | 40% | 95% | Jiang et al. (2006) |
E. coli | Oven dried | NaOH + SDS | 0.1 + 10% | 60% | 87% | 96% | Peng et al. (2013) |
R.eutropha | Fresh | SDS | 0.5%-20% | 75% | 97% | 92% | Kim et al. (2003) |
R.eutropha | Fresh | H2SO4 | 1 | 60% | 76% | 94% | Yu and Chen (2006) |
A.vinelandii | Fresh | NH3 | 1 | 84% | 94% | N.D. | Page and Cornish (1993) |
C.nector | Fresh | NaOH | 0.1 | 68% | 84% | 91% | Anis et al. (2013) |
E. coli | Fresh | NaOH | 0.2 | 79% | 97% | 91% | Choi and Lee (1999) |
P.acidivorans* | Fresh | NaOH | 0.2 | 68% | 89% | 97% | This study |
P.acidivorans* | Fresh | NH4OH | 0.2 | 68% | 65% | 78% | This study |
P.acidivorans* | Lyophilized | NH4OH | 0.2 | 68% | 87% | 96% | This study |
P.acidivorans* | Fresh | NaOH + SDS | 0.2 + 0.2% | 68% | 99% | 95% | This study |