Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparison of net photosynthetic rate, stomatal conductance, transpiration and internal CO 2 concentration in different treatments

From: Physiological and growth response of rice plants (Oryza sativa L.) to Trichoderma spp. inoculants

Treatment Net photosynthetic rate (μmolCO2m−2 s−1) Stomatal conductance (mmolH2O m−2 s−1) Internal CO2concentration (ppm)
Trichoderma sp. SL1 8.79(0.010) 979.08(0.00009) 358.91(0.037)
Trichoderma sp. SL2 8.66(0.007) 412.40(0.00070) 336.97(0.086)
Trichoderma sp. SL3 8.47(0.018) 1237.88(0.0022) 363.79(0.046)
Trichoderma sp. SL4 6.88(0.009) 752.65(0.0024) 358.60(0.023)
Trichoderma sp. SL5 7.38(0.043) 499.54(0.0008) 348.35(0.172)
Trichoderma sp. SL6 8.60(0.012) 1084.76(0.0014) 361.75(0.039)
Trichoderma sp. SL7 6.74(0.024) 712.38(0.0005) 361.23(0.076)
NPK 2.09(0.007) 340.16(0.0004) 376.69(0.045)
Control 6.21(0.016) 818.30(0.0002) 365.74(0.051)
LSD0.05 0.10 0.005 3.70
  1. Standard deviations are given in parentheses (n = 36).
  2. All means were significantly different between treatments at p < 0.05.