Production of ethanol and arabitol by Debaryomyces nepalensis: influence of process parameters
© Kumdam et al.; licensee Springer. 2013
Received: 2 January 2013
Accepted: 2 May 2013
Published: 9 May 2013
Debaryomyces nepalensis, osmotolerant yeast isolated from rotten apple, is known to utilize both hexoses and pentoses and produce industrially important metabolites like ethanol, xylitol and arabitol. In the present study, the effect of different growth substrates, trace elements, nitrogen concentration and initial pH on growth and formation of ethanol and arabitol were examined. Optimum conditions for maximizing the product yields were established: glucose as carbon source, an initial pH of 6.0, 6 g/L of ammonium sulphate and addition of micronutrients. Under these best suited conditions, a concentration of 11g/L of arabitol and 19 g/L of ethanol was obtained in shake flask fermentations. The fermentation was scaled up to 2.5 L bioreactor and the influence of aeration, agitation and initial substrate concentration was also determined. Under optimal conditions (150 g/L glucose, 400 rpm and 0.5 vvm) ethanol concentration reached 52 g/L, which corresponds to a yield of 0.34 g/g and volumetric productivity of 0.28 g/L/h, whereas arabitol production reached a maximum of 14 g/L with a yield and volumetric productivity of 0.1 g/g and 0.07 g/L/h respectively.
KeywordsD. nepalensis Arabitol Ethanol Fermentation Bioreactor Optimization
Lignocellulosic biomass represents the largest source of renewable energy, which is primarily composed of cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin. It forms the basis for the production of various value-added products by microbial conversion (Saha 2003; Kumar and Gummadi 2011; Kumar et al. 2008). For bioconversion, pre-treatment of lignocelluloses is important and the resulting hydrolysate contains high amount of hexoses and pentoses (Moiser et al. 2005; Saha 2003; Saha et al. 2005). Hemicelluloses are heteropolysaccharides composed of short chains of sugar units such as xylose, arabinose, mannose, glucose, galactose and glucuronic acids which can be acetylated or methylated (Chandel et al. 2010; Saha 2003; Saha et al. 2005).
Ethanol production by microbial fermentation has drawn considerable attention in the recent years because of its increased use as a fuel, often blended with gasoline. Lignocellulosic biomass has been considered a promising substrate for the production of bio ethanol (Balat and Balat 2009; Sanchez and Cardona 2008). One of the major impediments in utilizing lignocellulosic biomass as a feedstock is the inability of many yeasts to utilize both the hexose and pentose sugars, which are the principal components of hydrolysates from lignocellulose (Yuan et al. 2011; Tian et al. 2009; Sanchez and Cardona 2008). The ability of yeasts to metabolize these hexoses and pentoses has been studied widely. Yeast strains such as Candida tropicalis, Pichia stipitis and Pachysolen tannophilus were reported to ferment glucose/xylose mixtures to ethanol and xylitol (Hahn-Hägerdal et al. 2007; Sanchez et al. 2002; Sanchez et al. 2008). Candida entomeae and Pichia guillermondii were known to produce xylitol and arabitol from hydrolysates containing xylose and arabinose (Saha and Bothast 1996). Saha et al. (2007) showed that Zygosaccharomyces rouxii NRRL 27624 is capable of producing arabitol and ethanol from glucose but could not metabolize arabinose, which also is a prime component of hemicelluloses.
Arabitol, a pentitol that exists in both D and L forms, is sweet, colourless, crystalline and soluble in water with potential applications in food and pharmaceutical industries. Currently the production of arabitol is by the chemical reduction of lactones of arabinonic and lyxonic acids. This process requires an expensive catalyst and a very high temperature of 100°C. D-arabitol is used for synthesis of compounds which are enantiopure and have medical properties fit to be used as immunosuppressive glycolipids and herbicides (Koganti 2012). Arabitol plays an important role in energy controlled diet, as it is absorbed slowly by the digestive system. It is referred to as anti-cariogenic since it cannot be easily metabolized by the oral flora. Hence it has also been used as a common ingredient in chewing gums (Groleau et al. 1995; Koganti 2012).
Debaryomyces nepalensis NCYC 3413, a halotolerant strain that has been previously isolated from rotten apple, is capable of utilizing both hexoses and pentoses; and is also important in production of commercially valuable products such as arabitol, xylitol and ethanol (Gummadi and Kumar 2006a; Kumar and Gummadi 2011; Kumdam et al. 2012). In this study, the metabolism of D. nepalensis using glucose as the carbon source has been studied under different physiological conditions in both shake flask and bioreactor.
Materials and methods
Maintenance medium and inoculum preparation
Debaryomyces nepalensis NCYC 3413 was maintained on a solid YEPP medium containing yeast extract 10 g/l, peptone 20 g/l and pectin 5 g/l at pH 7.0 and incubated at 30°C for 26 h and later stored at 4°C. A single colony was transferred from an overnight-grown culture plate into the YEPD medium (50 ml) containing yeast extract 10 g/l, peptone 20 g/l and dextrose 20 g/l and incubated for 12 h at 30°C and 180 rpm.
Media composition and culture conditions
Semi-synthetic medium containing carbon source, 100 g/l; (NH4)2SO4, 3 g/l; MgSO4, 0.1 g/l; K2HPO4, 6 g/l; Na2HPO4, 3 g/l; yeast extract, 1 g/l; CaCl2·2H2O, 147 mg/l; FeCl3, 10 mg/l; MnSO4·H2O, 3.38 mg/l; ZnSO4·7H2O, 8 mg/l; CuSO4·5H2O, 0.5 mg/l; citric acid, 6.9 mg/l. The initial pH of the medium was adjusted to 7.0 using H3PO4 and NaOH. All the components are autoclaved separately and mixed subsequently so that the final medium volume was 50 ml in 250 ml Erlenmeyer flask. The influence of environmental and nutritional factors on growth and product formation was studied by varying the nutrient composition and physical parameters (pH and oxygen availability), which will be mentioned at appropriate section of the manuscript.
Cultivation in shake flasks
Shake flask experiments were carried out in 250 ml conical flasks with a working volume of 50 ml. The medium was inoculated with 2% (v/v) of inoculum and incubated at 30°C & 180 rpm for 120 h. Samples were collected at regular intervals to measure growth and the concentration of metabolites. All the samples were centrifuged at 8,000 rpm for 5 minutes. The supernatant was used for estimation of important metabolites (ethanol, arabitol and glycerol) and substrate utilization by high-performance liquid chromatography and the cell pellet was used to quantify growth.
Batch fermentations were carried out in a 2.5 L stirred-tank reactor (Minifors, Infors HT, Switzerland) with a working volume of 1.5 L. In all the experiments, the temperature was maintained at 30°C and the initial pH was adjusted to 6.0 and controlled using 2N H3PO4 and NaOH. The production medium was inoculated with 8% (v/v) of the seed culture and incubated for 6–10 days. The broth was agitated at different speeds (350 to 700 rpm) and the aeration levels were varied (0.3 to 0.5 vvm) depending on the study. Foaming was controlled by adding 2% polypropylene glycol if necessary. Samples were collected periodically and analyzed by HPLC. The dissolved oxygen concentration in the medium was continuously monitored using a DO probe (Mettler Toledo).
The growth was evaluated by measuring the optical density of culture at 600 nm (OD600). As standardized previously for D. nepalensis, absorbance 1.0 at 600 nm corresponds to 0.335 g cell dry weight per litre culture. Samples that were collected at regular intervals were analysed for metabolite production and substrate utilization. The cells were separated from culture medium and the supernatant was stored at 4°C (not more than 24 h) for further analysis. The concentration of glucose and other metabolites arabitol, ethanol and glycerol were estimated by HPLC (Jasco) equipped with refractive index detector and Aminex HPX-87H column (Bio-Rad, Richmond, USA) at 45°C with 0.01N H2SO4 solution as the mobile phase at a flow rate of 0.6 ml/min as described earlier (Kumar and Gummadi 2011) . The volumetric oxygen transfer coefficient (KLa) was determined by the static gassing-out method (Stanbury et al. 1995). The dissolved oxygen (DO) concentration in the fermentor was first brought down to zero by sparging the medium with nitrogen. Later air is sparged at a known flow rate and the increase in dissolved oxygen concentration was monitored with respect to time using a dissolved oxygen probe.
Effect of carbon sources
Effect of various medium components on the production of ethanol and arabitol
Substrate consumed (g/L)
3. Level of (NH 4 ) 2 SO 4 (g/L)
4. Trace elements
Effect of initial pH
Effect of nitrogen sources
The organism was grown in the presence of different sources of nitrogen like, ammonium sulphate, nitrates and nitrites along with yeast extract and its ability to produce ethanol and arabitol was studied. Among them, ammonium sulphate served as the best nitrogen source (data not shown), whereas, in the presence of nitrites and nitrates, the organism failed to metabolize glucose efficiently (data not shown). Yeast extract proved to be an integral source of amino acids and other vitamins for growth, without which, the organism had low efficiency for its metabolism.
Effect of trace elements
To understand the influence of trace elements on yeast metabolism, the organism was cultivated in the presence and absence of four trace elements (Zn, Fe, Cu and Mn). The medium which is devoid of all the four trace elements served as a negative control, whereas positive control is inclusive of all of them. Each of these four trace elements was removed one at a time in order to define their individual effect. Figure 4 shows the effect of different metal ions on growth and product formation. It was found that the organism required Zn, Fe, Cu and Mn for growth as well as product formation. Growth was better in the absence of Zn and Fe, but very low in the case of negative control (Figure 4a). This can be directly correlated with the substrate utilization, which was faster and complete in the medium without Zn and Fe (Figure 4b). However, for the maximum production of ethanol and arabitol all the four trace elements are required (Figure 4c, d). The final concentration of ethanol and arabitol along with their respective yields was given in Table 1. The product yields were lower, when the trace elements concentration was maintained above and below the levels considered in this study (data not shown).
Under optimal conditions, as determined by the shake flask results, the production of ethanol and arabitol was also studied in 2.5 L bench top bioreactor, where, the effects of aeration and agitation rate on growth and metabolite production were appreciated.
Effect of aeration
Effect of agitation speed
Effect of different aeration and agitation rates on the yield of arabitol and ethanol
Substrate consumed (g/L)
1. Aeration rate (vvm)
Ethanol and arabitol production at high substrate concentration
Kinetic parameters of ethanol and arabitol production at an initial substrate concentration of 150 g/L
K La (h -1)
Fermentation time (h)
Substrate consumed (g/L)
It was previously reported that D. nepalensis produces arabitol and ethanol when grown on glucose (Kumar and Gummadi 2011). The present study focuses on understanding the effect of various process parameters on product formation, with subsequent development of suitable medium for the production of both ethanol and arabitol using glucose as carbon source. Studies on the production of arabitol and ethanol by D. nepalensis in the presence of different carbon substrates indicated that fructose and glucose were favourable for ethanol production. Shafaghat et al. (2009) have studied the effect of glucose, fructose and sucrose on the growth and ethanol productivity of Saccharomyces cerevisiae PTCC 24860 and observed similar results. The fermentation performance of the organism was found to be better when fructose was used as carbon source (Shafaghat et al. 2009). Arabinose, followed by glucose, were found to be more favourable carbon sources for arabitol production, the yield being greater (0.29 g/g) with arabinose. Similarly, Ahmed (2001) has shown that glucose was the suitable carbon source for bioconversion to arabitol by Candida famata R28. Nobre and Da Costa (1985) have also shown that arabitol production was better in medium containing arabinose and glucose. In contrast to the above observation, Metschnikowia reukaufii AJ14787 was unable to convert arabinose to arabitol (Nozaki et al. 2003). D. nepalensis was found to utilize glycerol only for the formation of biomass. On the contrary, Koganti et al. have reported the production of arabitol using glycerol as carbon source by Debaryomyces hansenii NRRL Y-7483 (Koganti et al. 2011). Based on experimental findings and comparison with literature suggest that there exists unique metabolism in D. nepalensis for concomitant production of ethanol and arabitol. Using glucose as carbon source and at pH 6.0 a final concentration of 12 g/L of ethanol was achieved. A similar pH range of 4–6 was shown to be optimal for ethanol production by Kluyveromyces marxianus (Bajpai and Margaritis 1987) and Zymomonas mobilis (Lawford et al. 1988). Arabitol production was also maximum at pH 6.0 (Saha et al. 2007; Zhu et al. 2010).
An increase in the concentration of nitrogen in the medium has a positive effect on ethanol and arabitol production. In the present study, the yield of both ethanol and arabitol increased with increasing nitrogen concentration (or decreasing C/N ratio). This could be due to efficient utilization of glucose for product formation. But when the nitrogen concentration was further increased to 9 g/L, ethanol yield was reduced drastically to 0.09 g/g and there was a significant reduction in the percentage of glucose consumed (40% of the total glucose). Similar observation on the effect of nitrogen source was made by Abd-Aziz et al. (2001) on ethanol production by recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae YKU 131. It was also reported that decreasing C/N ratio resulted in poor ethanol yield (Manikandan and Viruthagiri 2010). Excessive nitrogen concentration was also shown to be unfavourable for arabitol production by Kodamae ohmeri (Zhu et al. 2010).
Trace elements such as Zinc, Mn, Cu, & Fe are involved in yeast metabolism as cofactors for enzymes and as components of respiratory pathways. Hence, it is obvious that, in the absence of these trace factors, metabolism would be impaired. Supplementing 0.5 mM Cu to the growth medium was found to enhance ethanol production by Saccharomyces (Azenha et al. 2000; McHargue and Calfee 1931). Similarly Zn, Fe and Mn were also shown to effect metabolism and by product formation in many yeasts and bacteria (Azenha et al. 2000; McHargue and Calfee 1931; Reeslev and Jensen 1995; Vesna et al. 2004; Fitzpatrick et al. 2001).
After selecting the appropriate ranges of medium components, the production of ethanol and arabitol was scaled up to 2.5 L bioreactor and the optimum aeration/agitation conditions were established. Oxygen is one of the important substrates for microbial metabolism. There were many reports indicating the necessity of adequate supply of oxygen for polyol production (Petrson et al. 1958; Hajny 1964; Escalante et al. 1990; Saha et al. 2007; Toyoda and Ohtaguchi 2011). In the present study, production of ethanol and arabitol was found to be maximum at lower rates of aeration and agitation. Drastic reduction of product yields and high biomass were observed when aeration was increased to 1 vvm. This could be due to the Pasteur effect, as indicated by Petrson et al. (1958) where higher levels of oxygen reduce the rate of fermentation. Several reports indicated that low levels of aeration and agitation are optimal for arabitol production (Petrson et al. 1958; Fonseca et al. 2007; Saha et al. 2007). Saha et al. (2007) studied the production of arabitol by Z. rouxii under different agitation rates and found that low agitation rates in the range 350–450 rpm were most conducive. But, in contrast to the above observation, Escalante et al. (1990) reported an increase in arabitol yield with increasing aeration and agitation speed. The partial anaerobic environment created by reduced agitation speed and low aeration rates resulted in maximum ethanol yield. When the initial substrate concentration was increased, the production of both ethanol and arabitol also increased. The increase in arabitol yield can be attributed to the osmotic stress caused by high sugar concentration. This is in agreement with earlier published report where D. nepalensis produced arabitol as a compatible solute along with glycerol to overcome hyperosmotic stress (Kumar and Gummadi 2011). This result also corresponds to the observations made by Morant et al. that arabitol production increased when Z. rouxii was cultivated in the presence of high glucose concentrations (Morant and Witter 1979). Similarly, Brown (1974) reported that the amount of arabitol produced by Saccharomyces rouxii was influenced by the solute concentration of the medium in which the organism was cultivated. But, in the case of Hansenula polymorpha, there was a reduction in arabitol production with increasing osmotic pressure (Escalante et al. 1990).
In this work, optimal conditions for the production of arabitol and ethanol were determined. Under these conditions, the final product concentrations were significant for industrial application. It can be concluded that by manipulation of various fermentation parameters, it is possible to favour the production of desired metabolite. The ability of D.nepalensis NCYC 3413 to ferment different sugars was analyzed. The organism utilises glucose substantially to produce bioethanol and arabitol. Since it shows utilization of simple sugars efficiently, exploitation of this organism in conversion of raw substrate rich in simple sugars needs to be explored.
The authors thank the Department of Biotechnology, Government of India for funding. HK acknowledges Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, India for fellowship.
- Abd-Aziz S, Ang DC, Yusof HM, Karim MIA, Ariff AB, Uchiyama K, Shioya S: Effect of C/N ratio and starch concentration on ethanol production from sago starch using recombinant yeast. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 2001, 17: 713–719. 10.1023/A:1012981206897View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ahmed Z: The properties of Candida famata R 28 for D-arabitol production from D glucose. Online J Biol Sci 2001, 1: 1005–1008.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Azenha M, Teresa M, Vasconcelos SD, Ferreira PM: The Influence of Cu concentration on ethanolic fermentation by Saccharomyces cerevisiae . J Biosci Bioeng 2000, 90: 163–167.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bajpai P, Margaritis A: The effect of temperature and pH on ethanol production by free and immobilized cells of Kluyveromyces marxianus grown on Jerusalem artichoke extract. Biotechnol Bioeng 1987, 30: 306–313. 10.1002/bit.260300222PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Balat M, Balat H: Recent trends in global production and utilization of bio-ethanol fuel. Appl Energy 2009, 86: 2273–2282. 10.1016/j.apenergy.2009.03.015View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Brown AD: Microbial water relations: features of the intracellular composition of sugar-tolerant yeasts. J Bacteriol 1974,118(3):769–777.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chandel AC, Chandrasekhar G, Radhika K, Ravinder R, Ravindra P: Bioconversion of pentose sugars into ethanol: a review and future directions. Biotech and Mol Bio Review 2010, 6: 008–020.Google Scholar
- Escalante J, Caminal G, Figueredo M, DeMas C: Production of arabitol from glucose by Hansenula polymorpha . J Ferment Bioeng 1990, 70: 228–231. 10.1016/0922-338X(90)90053-YView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Fitzpatrick JJ, Ahrens M, Smith S: Effect of manganese on Lactobacillus casei fermentation to produce lactic acid from whey permeate. Proc Biochem 2001, 36: 671–675. 10.1016/S0032-9592(00)00265-XView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Fonseca C, Isabel S-M, Barbel HH: L-arabinose metabolism in Candida arabinofermentans PYCC 5603T and Pichia guillermondii PYCC 3012: influence of sugar and oxygen on product formation. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2007, 75: 303–310. 10.1007/s00253-006-0830-7PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Groleau D, Chevalier P, Tse Hing Yuen TLS: Production of polyols and ethanol by the osmophilic yeast Zygosaccharomyces rouxii . Biotechnol Lett 1995, 17: 315–320. 10.1007/BF01190645View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gummadi SN, Kumar SD: Optimization of chemical and physical parameters affecting the activity of pectin lyase and pectate lyase from Debaryomyces nepalensis : a statistical approach. Biochem Eng J 2006, 30: 130–137. 10.1016/j.bej.2006.02.014View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gummadi SN, Kumar SD: Pectin Lyase and Pectate Lyase from Debaryomyces nepalensis Isolated from Apple. Res J Microbiol 2006, 1: 152–159.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hahn-Hägerdal B, Karhumaa K, Fonseca C, Spencer-Martins I, Gorwa-Grauslund MF: Towards industrial pentose-fermenting yeast strains. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2007, 74: 937–953. 10.1007/s00253-006-0827-2PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hajny GJ: D-arabitol production by Endomycopsis chodati . Appl Microbiol 1964, 12: 87–92.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Koganti S: Conversion of biodiesel byproduct glycerol to arabitol and sophorolipids through microbial fermentation. University of Akron, Dissertation; 2012.Google Scholar
- Koganti S, Kuo TM, Kurtzman CP, Smith N, Ju LK: Production of arabitol from glycerol: strain screening and study of factors affecting production yield. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2011, 90: 257–267. 10.1007/s00253-010-3015-3PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kumar S, Gummadi SN: Metabolism of glucose and xylose as single and mixed feed in Debaryomyces nepalensis NCYC 3413: production of industrially important metabolites. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2011, 89: 1405–1415. 10.1007/s00253-010-2997-1PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kumar R, Singh S, Singh OV: Bioconversion of lignocellulosic biomass: biochemical and molecular perspectives. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 2008, 35: 377–391. 10.1007/s10295-008-0327-8PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kumdam HB, Murthy SN, Gummadi SN: A statistical approach to optimize xylitol production by Debaryomyces nepalensis NCYC 3413 in vitro . Food Nutri Sci 2012, 3: 1027–1036. 10.4236/fns.2012.38136View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lawford H, Holloway P, Ruggiero A: Effect of pH on growth and ethanol production by Zymomonas . Biotechnol Lett 1988, 10: 809–814. 10.1007/BF01027578View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Manikandan K, Viruthagiri T: Optimization of C/N ratio of the medium and fermentation conditions of ethanol production from tapioca starch using co–culture of Aspergillus niger and Saccharomyces cerevisiae . Int J Chem Tech Res 2010,2(2):947–955.Google Scholar
- McHargue JS, Calfee RK: Effect of manganese, copper and zinc on the growth of yeast. Plant Physiol 1931, 559–566.Google Scholar
- Moiser N, Wyman C, Dale B, Elander R, Lee YY, Holtzapple M, Ladisch M: Features of promising technologies for pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass. Bioresource Technol 2005, 96: 673–686. 10.1016/j.biortech.2004.06.025View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Morant JW, Witter LD: Effect of sugars on D-arabitol production and glucose metabolism in Saccharomyces rouxii . J Bacteriol 1979, 138: 823–831.Google Scholar
- Nobre MF, Da Costa MS: Factors favouring the accumulation of arabinitol in the yeast Debaryomyces hansenii . Can J Microbiol 1985, 31: 467–471. 10.1139/m85-087View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Nozaki H, Suzuku H, Tsuyoshi N, Yokozeki K: Production of D-arabitol by Metschnikowia reukaufii AJ14787. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 2003, 67: 1923–1929. 10.1271/bbb.67.1923PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Petrson WH, Hendershot WF, Hajny GJ: Factors affecting production of glycerol and D-arabitol by representative yeasts of the genus Zygosaccharomyces . Appl Microbiol 1958, 6: 349–357.Google Scholar
- Reeslev M, Jensen B: Influence of Zn 2+ and Fe 3+ on polysaccharide production and mycelium/yeast dimorphism of Aureobasidium pullulans in batch cultivations. Appl Micrbiol Biotechnol 1995, 42: 910–915. 10.1007/BF00191190View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Saha BC: Hemicellulose bioconversion. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 2003, 30: 279–291. 10.1007/s10295-003-0049-xPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Saha BC, Bothast RJ: Production of L-arabitol from L-arabinose by Candida entomaea and Pichia guillermondii . Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 1996, 45: 299–306. 10.1007/s002530050687View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Saha BC, Iten LB, Cotta MA, Wu YV: Dilute acid pretreatment, enzymatic saccharification and fermentation of wheat straw to ethanol. Proc Biochem 2005, 40: 3693–3700. 10.1016/j.procbio.2005.04.006View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Saha BC, Sakakibara Y, Cotta MA: Production of D-arabitol by a newly isolated Zygosaccharomyces rouxii . J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 2007, 34: 519–523. 10.1007/s10295-007-0211-yPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sanchez OJ, Cardona CA: Trends in biotechnological production of fuel ethanol from different feedstocks. Bioresource Technol 2008, 99: 5270–5295. 10.1016/j.biortech.2007.11.013View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sanchez S, Bravo V, Castro E, Moya AJ, Camacho F: The fermentation of mixtures of D-glucose and D-xylose by Candida shehatae, Pichia stipitis or Pachysolen tannophilus to produce ethanol. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 2002, 77: 641–648. 10.1002/jctb.622View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sanchez S, Bravo V, Garcia JF, Cruz N, Cuevas M: Fermentation of D-glucose and D-xylose mixtures by Candida tropicalis NBRC 0618 for xylitol production. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 2008, 24: 709–716. 10.1007/s11274-007-9527-zView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Shafaghat H, Najafpour GD, Rezaei PS, Sharifzadeh M: Growth kinetics and ethanol productivity of Saccharomyces cerevisiae PTCC 24860 on various carbon sources. World Appl Sci J 2009, 7: 140–144.Google Scholar
- Stanbury PF, Whitaker A, Hall SJ: Principles of fermentation technology. 2nd edition. Pregamon Press, New York; 1995.Google Scholar
- Tian S, Zhou G, Yan F, Yu Y, Yang X: Yeast strains for ethanol production from lignocellulosic hydrolysates during in situ detoxification. Biotechnol Adv 2009, 27: 656–660. 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2009.04.008PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Toyoda T, Ohtaguchi K: D- arabitol production from lactose by Kluvyeromyces lactis at different aerobic conditions. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 2011, 86: 217–222. 10.1002/jctb.2497View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Vesna ST, Vlatka GZ, Damir S, Slobodan G, Nada V: Zinc, copper and manganese enrichment in yeast Saccharomyces cerevisae . Food Technol Biotechnol 2004,42(2):115–120.Google Scholar
- Yuan D, Rao K, Relue P, Varanasi S: Fermentation of biomass sugars to ethanol using native industrial yeast strains. Bioresource Technol 2011, 102: 3246–3253. 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.11.034View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zhu H-Y, Xu H, Dai X-Y, Zhang A, Ying H-J, Ouyang P-K: Production of D-arabitol by a newly isolated Kodamaea ohmeri . Bioproc Biosyst Eng 2010, 33: 565–571. 10.1007/s00449-009-0378-xView ArticleGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.