Resolution of volatile fuel compound profiles from Ascocoryne sarcoides: a comparison by proton transfer reaction-mass spectrometry and solid phase microextraction gas chromatography-mass spectrometry
© Mallette et al; licensee Springer. 2012
Received: 22 February 2012
Accepted: 5 April 2012
Published: 5 April 2012
Volatile hydrocarbon production by Ascocoryne sacroides was studied over its growth cycle. Gas-phase compounds were measured continuously with a proton transfer reaction-mass spectrometry (PTR-MS) and at distinct time points with gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) using head space solid phase microextraction (SPME). The PTR-MS ion signal permitted temporal resolution of the volatile production while the SPME results revealed distinct compound identities. The quantitative PTR-MS results showed the volatile production was dominated by ethanol and acetaldehyde, while the concentration of the remainder of volatiles consistently reached 2,000 ppbv. The measurement of alcohols from the fungal culture by the two techniques correlated well. Notable compounds of fuel interest included nonanal, 1-octen-3-ol, 1-butanol, 3-methyl- and benzaldehyde. Abiotic comparison of the two techniques demonstrated SPME fiber bias toward higher molecular weight compounds, making quantitative efforts with SPME impractical. Together, PTR-MS and SPME GC-MS were shown as valuable tools for characterizing volatile fuel compound production from microbiological sources.
KeywordsBiofuel Solid phase microextraction Proton transfer reaction-mass spectrometry Volatile organic compounds Fungal hydrocarbons Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry
Ascocoryne sarcoides is an endophytic fungus recently isolated from Northern Patagonia and has the potential to produce a petroleum-like fuel (Mycodiesel®) directly from a cellulose fermentation process [Strobel, Knighton, Kluck, Ren, Livinghouse, Griffin, Spakowicz and Sears 2008]. Fungi produce medium to long chain hydrocarbons, and the prevalence of these compounds is in the C19-C30 chain length [Ladygina, Dedyukhina and Vainshtein 2006]. In contrast, Ascocoryne sarcoides (NRRL 50072) has been reported to produce a series of straight chained and branched medium chain-length hydrocarbons of C5-C10 chain length, in the range of gasoline fuel, including heptane, 2-pentene, octane, 1-methyl-cyclohexene, 3,5-octadiene, and cyclodecene [Solomons and Fryhle 2002, Griffin, Spakowicz, Gianoulis and Strobel 2010]. This interesting metabolism requires further work to characterize growth patterns and develop the organism for potential biofuel applications.
Recent studies have identified a variety of compounds produced by A. sarcoides on different media using headspace GC-MS on discrete solid phase microextraction (SPME) fiber samples [Griffin, Spakowicz, Gianoulis and Strobel 2010, Strobel et al. 2008]. The SPME technique was introduced in the 1990's [Arthur and Pawliszyn 1990], and SPME fibers have been used to identify and quantify complex volatile mixtures including hydrocarbons from water, soil, food and wine [Langenfeld et al. 1996, Mallouchos et al. 2002, Parkerton et al. 2000, Robinson et al. 2011]. Its advantages include minimizing systematic errors with extraction of volatiles, eliminating the need for solvents [Wercinski 1999], and being simple, fast and relatively sensitive [Pawliszyn 1999]. However, several studies have revealed instabilities with quantification by this method [Brás et al. 2011, Weldegergis et al. 2011, Zeng and Noblet 2002], so further evaluation of the quantitative use of the method for volatile mixtures from A. sarcoides was tested.
Another analytical method with potential for analyzing biofuels, proton transfer reaction-mass spectrometry (PTR-MS) has been used to monitor volatile organic compounds (VOCs) emitted from plants, bacteria and subterranean fungi [Aprea et al. 2007, 2009, Bäck et al. 2010, Bunge et al. 2008, Kai et al. 2010, Maleknia et al. 2007, Ramirez et al. 2009, Steeghs 2004]. These studies often employed solid substrata, rarely included submerged liquid fungal cultivation [Bäck et al. 2010], and collected data in discrete time points. To our knowledge, however, no studies have used PTR-MS to investigate the continuous evolution of volatile organic fuel compounds from a submerged liquid fungal culture over its entire growth cycle.
An advantage of PTR-MS is that it can be run in real time to continuously collect data on the concentrations of specific compounds [Ezra et al. 2004, Lindinger et al. 1998, Tomsheck et al. 2010]. PTR-MS is primarily a quantitative tool and generally requires a detailed knowledge of the components present to be successfully employed. Ion mass (as measured by a quadrupole mass spectrometer) is not a unique indicator of chemical composition. For instance, an ion at m/z 107 can represent either C8H10H+ (ethylbenzene or xylene isomer) or C7H6OH+ (benzaldehyde). Beyond the identification of a few small molecules, such as acetaldehyde and methanol, interpretation of the PTR-MS measurements of complex VOC mixtures benefits from the support of another separation technique to provide identification of components.
SPME GC-MS has been combined with PTR-MS to better elucidate VOCs from plants [Aprea et al. 2009, Bouvier-Brown et al. 2007, Ruth et al. 2005] and human lungs [Bajtarevic et al. 2009, King et al. 2010]. These studies showed the combined techniques allowed for both qualitative and quantitative determinations of VOCs. The use of SPME in conjunction with PTR-MS added qualitative value to the interpretation of the PTR-MS data and strengthened the information obtained from experimentation, particularly as it applied to biological metabolic processes. The knowledge of compounds present obtained by SPME allowed elucidation of the most probable sources assigned to ions measured by the PTR-MS.
Here, PTR-MS was combined with headspace SPME GC-MS to explore the applicability of both methods for time-course resolution and quantification of volatiles emitted over the culture cycle of A. sarcoides. We present the results of the continuous PTR-MS method as compared with those of discrete headspace SPME GC-MS for monitoring the activity of a novel fungal culture and show both the benefits and shortcomings of each technique.
Materials and methods
Culture medium and conditions
Ascocoryne sarcoides (NRRL 50072) was provided by Dr. Gary Strobel and grown in a Biostat B Twin Plus 5-liter jacketed reactor (Sartorius Stedim Biotech) on a minimal medium consisting of (per liter): glucose (20 g), ammonium chloride (5 g), NaH2PO4.2H2O (2.75 g), MgSO4.7H2O (0.86 g), Ca(NO3)2.4H2O (.28 g), yeast extract (0.05 g), and trace salts: KCl (60 mg), KNO3 (80 mg), FeCl3 (2 mg), MnCl2 (5 mg), ZnSO4 (2.5 mg), H3BO3 (1.4 mg), and KI (0.7 mg). The minimal medium was used, in contrast to a more nutrient rich one, to minimize the amount of volatile compounds originating from the medium. An un-inoculated control reactor was run to account for background VOCs resulting from the medium constituents or air supply. Both vessels were sparged with air from compressed air cylinders at 1.5 L/min. This sparge air was humidified prior to introduction into the Biostat to minimize evaporative losses. The pH was controlled at 4.5 with 2 M HCl, 2 M NaOH and was continuously monitored by an internal Hamiltion Easyferm Plus probe. In addition, the stir rate (250 rpm) and temperature (23°C) were held constant by the Biostat control system. The reactor gaseous effluent was sent to the PTR-MS and an off-gas analyzer for O2 and CO2 measurements.
Accumulation of A. sarcoides was analyzed through daily samples of cell dry weight, where samples were filtered onto glass fiber filters (Whatman GF/F), rinsed, and dried overnight in an oven at 80°C. Once removed from the oven, filters were allowed to equilibrate at room temperature in a desiccator and then weighed. Daily glucose concentrations were measured by High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC), Agilent 1200 using an Aminex HPX-87H ion exclusion column at 45°C with 0.005 M H2SO4 eluent.
Quantification of volatiles by PTR-MS
Proton transfer reaction-mass spectrometry (PTR-MS) was used to quantify a selected set of volatile compounds produced by A. sarcoides by constantly monitoring the gaseous effluent from the cultured reactor into the stationary phase of growth. The PTR-MS instrument ionized organic molecules in the gas phase through their reaction with H3O+, forming protonated molecules (MH+, where M is the neutral organic molecule) and fragment ions, which were detected by a standard quadrupole mass spectrometer. This process can be used with volatiles in air with or without dilution, since the primary constituents of air (nitrogen, oxygen, argon and carbon dioxide) have a proton affinity less than water and thus are not ionized. Most organic molecules (excepting alkanes) have a proton affinity greater than water and are therefore ionized and detected [Lindinger et al. 1998].
The cultured and un-inoculated controls were analyzed by diverting a portion of the reactor effluent gas to the PTR-MS. Measurements were made from the initial inoculation until 18.5 days. At times, the gas stream was diluted with additional air to prevent premature degradation of the MS detector and keep measurements within the linear dynamic range of the PTR-MS. During dilution periods, the dilution stream was added to the reactor effluent stream and balanced with the effluent flow rate using flow controllers. Sample lines were constructed from PFA Teflon tubing and stainless steel fittings. Mass spectral scans were acquired from 20 to 220 amu at 0.5 sec/amu.
The absolute concentration of constituents in a sample were quantified directly from the measured ion intensities using the known reaction time and the theoretical reaction rate constant for the proton transfer reaction [Lindinger et al. 1998]. Concentrations reported within were derived from the PTR-MS measurements and calculated using equations derived from reaction kinetics, assuming a reaction rate coefficient of 2 × 10-9 ml s-1 which is appropriate for the measured compounds [Ezra et al. 2004, Lindinger et al. 1998]. This method provided a means by which the measured ion intensity at any mass can be expressed as an equivalent estimate of concentration.
The total VOC concentration produced by the fungal culture is taken as the difference between the fungal culture and the control measurements. This total reflects only the contribution from those species having proton affinities greater than that of water, which is assumed to represent the majority of the VOCs produced.
Volatile analysis with SPME GC-MS
Solid phase microextraction (SPME) was used to identify gaseous compounds as described previously [Griffin et al. 2010], but a brief description of the relevant details is provided here. Throughout the growth period, 12 mL of A. sarcoides culture was aseptically removed, sealed, centrifuged at 4,000 rpm for 4 minutes, then 10 mL of supernatant was added to a GC vial and stored at 4°C until analysis. For analysis, the SPME fiber (divinylbenzene/Carboxen on polydimethylsiloxane by Supelco) (Bellefonte, PA) was exposed to the vial headspace while the sample was stirred for 45 minutes. The fiber was inserted into the injection port of the GC at 240°C. The GC temperature was held at 40°C for 2 minutes, and then ramped to 230°C at 5°C min-1. The mass spectrometer was tuned to meet EPA Method 8260 BFB tuning criteria. The relative amount of identified compounds was estimated by comparison with a 4-bromofluorobenzene internal standard calibration curve delivered in methanol over the concentration range of 2 to 75 μg/mL.
The quantities of volatiles desorbed from the fiber were calculated from the peak area of the total ion current measured by the mass spectrometer. This method assumed that fungal VOCs and the internal standard have the same gas-liquid partitioning, efficiency of adsorption to the fiber, and response in the GC-MS system as that of the internal standard. As will be shown later, all of these conditions are not met, and the quantities obtained are estimates. Nevertheless, the use of the internal standard allowed for a relative quantitative comparison between samples from the same culture across a time period. Data acquisition and data processing were performed on Hewlett Packard ChemStation software system. The identification of compounds produced by A. sarcoides was made via library comparison using the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) database, and all chemical compounds described in this report use the NIST Chemistry WebBook terminology [Linstrom and Mallard 2011]. When the library identified multiple compounds as matches, careful consideration of the spectra yielded one with much higher similarity or a determination of "unknown" was made.
Henry's law constants
Initial concentrations and Henry's Law constants for compounds run as standards in the abiotic experiment
Henry's Law Constantsa
C o b (+/-)
Where CA is the gaseous concentration of A, F is the flow rate of gas, V is the volume of liquid containing A, R is the ideal gas constant, and T is the temperature.
The SPME results in Figure 1 show that the divinylbenzene/Carboxen on polydimethylsiloxane fiber is inefficient at trapping acetaldehyde and ethanol. This result is not totally unexpected, as the fiber is not specified for the analysis of C2 compounds. It appears that the SPME fiber did not provide results proportional to the amount of acetaldehyde or ethanol present. Additionally, the SPME measurements of 1-butanol, 3-methyl- had a contradictory trend to the PTR-MS measurements and did not decrease in concentration over time. The SPME results for the higher molecular weight components appear to more closely follow the anticipated Henry's law behavior and are fairly consistent with the PTR-MS results with correlation coefficients above 0.8.
Quantification of volatile products of A. sarcoides
Select ion signals in the dynamic headspace of A.sarcoides culture measured by PTR-MS
Signal Intensity (ppbv) at given age in daysc
71 [1-butanol, 3-methyl-]
89 [ethyl acetate]
The total ion signal was consistent with A. sarcoides biomass concentration; meaning VOC production was closely related with growth (Figure 3). The VOC concentration profiles vary by compound as shown in Figure 4 with some being associated with growth. The compounds with the highest concentrations were acetaldehyde and ethanol. The major ion signatures, m/z 101, m/z 119, and m/z 159 found in the [Strobel et al. (2008)] experiment on oatmeal agar were not observed in this study. This change in product composition is most likely due to different carbon source and experimental conditions.
Identification of volatile products of A. sarcoides
GC-MS head-space analysis of VOCs produced by A.sarcoides culture collected with a SPME fiber
Peak Area at given age in daysb
(Molecular mass (Da))
Heptane, 4-methyl- (114)d
Ethyl acetate (88)c
1-Propanol, 2-methyl- (74)c,d
1-Butanol, 3-methyl- (impure) (88)c,d
Unknown (159 or 88)
Acetic acid, octyl ester (172)c
Acetic acid, nonyl ester (186)c
Acetic acid, n-decyl ester (200)c,d
C15H24, sesquiterpene (204)c
Benzyl alcohol (108)c,d
Butanoic acid, 3-methyl- (102)c
Oxime-, methoxy-phenyl- (151)
Acetic acid, 2-phenylethyl ester (164)c
Phenylethyl alcohol (122)c,d
As noted in Table 3, twelve compounds identified in this study were also detected by [Griffin et al. (2010)] on various media including cellulose. Although there were major differences in the volatile constituents identified, this was not surprising due to the very different experimental conditions of this study. For example, acetic acid, heptyl ester was reported [Strobel et al. 2008] as one of most abundant compounds, but it was not identified by SPME in these results. However, many minor compounds identified by [Strobel et al. (2008)] on oatmeal agar were identified in this study despite conservative identification changes later made [Strobel et al. 2010]. These compounds are noted in Table 3 and include heptane, 2-methyl-; acetic acid, decyl ester; ethanol; 1-propanol, 2-methyl-; phenylethyl alcohol; 1-butanol, 3-methyl-; and an isomer of 3-octen-2-ol (1-octen-3-ol).
Of the compounds identified by SPME GC-MS, the concentration profiles of several correlated with the PTR-MS measured concentrations with correlation coefficient exceeding 0.80 (Tables 2 and 3). These compounds include acetic acid, ethyl ester (89) and the alcohols: 1-butanol, 3-methyl- (71), 1-octen-3-ol (111) (Figure 4). The concentration profile of 1-butanol, 3-methyl- as indicated by SPME correlated well with the PTR-MS measurements of ion 71 (Figure 4) with a correlation coefficient of 0.93, despite the negative correlation found by the abiotic results (Figures 1 and 2). A possible explanation for this is the concentrations of other compounds in the fungal gas phase were small and did not preferentially displace 1-butanol, 3-methyl- from the fiber, while in the abiotic results, this was not the case. The concentration profiles for 1-octen-3-ol were strikingly similar despite the relatively low concentration of this product. This was also the case for butanoic acid, 3-methyl- and nonanal whose PTR-MS measured concentrations were less than 1 ppbv. Like 1-butanol, 3-methyl-, their measured concentrations steadily increased through the majority of the time points. The variance in reported signals is seen in Tables 2 and 3 and Figure 4.
The SPME measurements of compounds that did not correlate well with the PTR-MS signal included benzaldehyde (107) and 1-propanol, 2-methyl- (57). For benzaldehyde, the first SPME data point matches the PTR-MS signal, but afterwards, the measured SPME concentrations are out of step with PTR-MS concentrations (Figure 4). There was a similar incongruity with the 1-propanol, 2-methyl- measurements. The PTR-MS measurement of 1-propanol, 2-methyl- is made by monitoring the m/z 57 ion. The m/z 57 ion, however, is not unique to 1-propanol, 2-methyl-, and it is probable that the lack of agreement between the PTR-MS and SPME results may be due to signal interference in the PTR-MS measurement. While perturbations in the PTR-MS signal for benzaldehyde could be similarly explained by signal interference, but the abiotic results for benzaldehyde showed no interference, eliminating this possibility.
Taken together, the results of the PTR-MS and SPME GC-MS techniques provide a more definitive description of the VOCs produced by A. sarcoides for product (e.g. biofuel) development. However, the challenges associated with the quantitative and qualitative analysis of complex VOC mixtures in an aqueous solution are non-trivial, and neither method had the ability to both identify and quantify the breadth of compound diversity synthesized by this complex fungal system.
The A. sarcoides culture consistently produced numerous VOCs. There was little quantitative agreement in VOC concentrations between the SPME technique and the PTR-MS for the suite of compounds produced by A. sarcoides. Both techniques have advantages for exploring potential fuel products from fungal or other cultures. SPME effectively identifies a range of compounds produced by the culture, and at modest concentrations, has adequate fiber capacity for many relevant compounds. The use of PTR-MS gives quantitative data on the evolution of volatiles permitting temporal resolution of microbial volatile production. These data can be used to help elucidate real-time metabolism shifts of an organism for product applications (excluding alkanes) and metabolic modeling. The PTR-MS results may also be valuable in guiding genetic engineering efforts to improve production rates of specific compounds..
To effectively use PTR-MS and SPME GC-MS, the inherent differences in signal acquistion must be considered. Foremost, PTR-MS is a continuous measurement of VOCs in the gaseous stream stripped from an aqueous culture; SPME is a measurement of the headspace compounds that develop above a liquid aliquot after a 45 minute exposure and equilibration period. However, SPME is not truly an equilibrium measurement, because the concentration of the headspace is potentially being depleted by compounds adsorbing to the fiber, lowering their vapor pressure and thereby constantly shifting the headspace composition (Eq. 1) [Zeng and Noblet 2002]. SPME adsorbs VOCs from the headspace then estimates a liquid concentration based on one internal standard. Therefore, we anticipate differences in distribution of VOCs detected by the two methods (Figures 1 and 2). The measurement variability that exists between the two techniques should decrease if the gaseous effluent measured by the PTR-MS is at or near equilibrium with the compounds in the liquid. Based on the abiotic experimental results with a known mixture of VOC standards, equilibrium was assumed for the experimental reactor system.
A limitation of PTR-MS is that alkanes are not ionized by H3O+ and therefore are not detectable making it unsuitable for some biofuel applications. Additional quantitative complications can arise due to the presence of fragment ions (decomposition products of the protonated molecule). While ionization via proton transfer with H3O+ is considered to be a relatively soft ionization method, many of the components produced by A. sarcoides fragment extensively. Most notable are the alcohols that, except for methanol, fragment by the elimination of H2O from the protonated molecule [Buhr et al. 2002]. Thus, the alcohols are detected as an ion corresponding to (M-OH)+. Despite these considerations, the results clearly demonstrate the applicability of the PTR-MS for time series resolution of volatiles from biological cultures.
SPME analysis should reflect the chemical composition and capacity on the SPME fiber if possible. However, not all compounds adsorb to the fiber material with equal affinities or at equal rates, such that the use of one internal standard is not sufficient to determine all constituent concentrations [Pawliszyn 1997]. The preferential adsorption by some compounds appears to be further exacerbated if the capacity of the fiber is exceeded. The least volatile, highest affinity compounds will be extracted from the headspace-liquid matrix last, therefore adequate extraction times must be observed [Pawliszyn 1999]. Therefore, drawing conclusions about the concentration of constituents in complex mixtures is very difficult due to fiber selectivity and saturation characteristics. In general, the SPME fiber appeared to preferentially adsorb the higher molecular weight compounds and therefore over predicts their abundance (Table 3). While these ions may have been detected by the PTR-MS, signals were low in concentration either because their headspace concentrations were low or because of possible adsorptive losses in the sample lines and therefore were not included in Table 2. An outcome of this preferential adsorption was seen in the 1-butanol, 3-methyl- data. In the fungal culture, the SPME data correlated well with the PTR-MS signal (Figure 4), but not in the abiotic data (Figure 1) because the culture headspace environment was dominated by lower molecular weight compounds. The negative trend seen in the abiotic results was most likely because the higher molecular weight compounds were preferentially adsorbed by the SPME fiber, leaving few adsorption sites for the other compounds (Figure 1). The extent of fiber bias for the lower volatility, higher molecular weight compounds is not easily predicted or measured for complex mixtures. However, SPME appears to be more applicable in the fungal headspace environment than in conditions where higher concentrations of higher molecular weight compounds were present, such as in the abiotic system.
The PTR-MS and SPME results demonstrated the quantitative limits of the SPME technique even when an internal standard was used. However, use of SPME to estimate relative concentrations of higher molecular weight compounds may be reasonable if application is restricted to qualitative temporal trends and not individual quantitative time points. A possibility for improving the SPME technique is to use replicate samples with additional fiber types to better capture and characterize the breadth of compounds present.
This study shows that despite their shortcomings, the combined use of PTR-MS with a qualitative technique such as GC-MS by headspace SPME is a valuable method for obtaining more detailed analysis of the VOCs produced by microbial systems and can be applied to biofuel product development. However, when quantifying compounds as produced by metabolic processes, especially when those compounds are in a complex mixture, the combination of multiple techniques is warranted until a single more robust qualitative and quantitative analytical method is developed.
Gas Chromatography - Mass Spectrometry
National Institute of Standards and Technology
Proton Transfer Reaction - Mass Spectrometry
Solid Phase Microextraction
Volatile Organic Compounds.
The authors would like to thank Elle Pankratz for her general laboratory assistance and continuous hard work. This work was supported by the National Science Foundation (NSF) Emerging Frontiers in Research and Innovation (EFRI), Grant No. 0937613 and Chemical, Bioengineering, Environmental and Transport Systems (CBET), Grant No. 0802666. Additional funding for Natasha Mallette was provided by the NSF Integrated Graduate and Education Research Traineeship (IGERT) Program. Manuscript preparation was supported by the National Science Foundation (NSF) Emerging Frontiers in Research and Innovation (EFRI), Grant No. 0937613
- Aprea E, Biasioli F, Carlin S, Endrizzi I, Gasperi F: Investigation of Volatile Compounds in Two Raspberry Cultivars by Two Headspace Techniques: Solid-Phase Microextraction/Gas Chromatography Mass Spectrometry (SPME/GC MS) and Proton-Transfer Reaction Mass Spectrometry (PTR MS). J Agr Food Chem 2009, 57: 4011–4018. doi:10.1021/jf803998c 10.1021/jf803998cView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Aprea E, Biasioli F, Carlin S, Versini G, Märk TD, Gasperi F: Rapid white truffle headspace analysis by proton transfer reaction mass spectrometry and comparison with solid-phase microextraction coupled with gas chromatography/mass spectrometry. Rapid Commun Mass Sp 2007, 21: 2564–2572. doi:10.1002/rcm.3118 10.1002/rcm.3118View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Arthur CL, Pawliszyn J: Solid phase microextraction with thermal desorption using fused silica optical fibers. Anal Chem 1990, 62: 2145–2148. doi:10.1021/ac00218a019 10.1021/ac00218a019View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bäck J, Aaltonen H, Hellén H, Kajos MK, Patokoski J, Taipale R, Pumpanen J, Heinonsalo J: Variable emissions of microbial volatile organic compounds (MVOCs) from root-associated fungi isolated from Scots pine. Atmos Environ 2010, 44: 3651–3659. doi:16/j.atmosenv.2010.06.042 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.06.042View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bajtarevic A, Ager C, Pienz M, Klieber M, Schwarz K, Ligor M, Ligor T, Filipiak W, Denz H, Fiegl M, Hilbe W, Weiss W, Lukas P, Jamnig H, Hackl M, Haidenberger A, Buszewski B, Miekisch W, Schubert J, Amann A: Noninvasive detection of lung cancer by analysis of exhaled breath. BMC Cancer 2009, 9: 348. doi:10.1186/1471–2407–9-348 10.1186/1471-2407-9-348PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bouvier-Brown NC, Holzinger R, Palitzsch K, Goldstein AH: Quantifying sesquiterpene and oxygenated terpene emissions from live vegetation using solid-phase microextraction fibers. J Chromatogr A 2007, 1161: 113–120. doi:16/j.chroma.2007.05.094 10.1016/j.chroma.2007.05.094View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Brás I, Ratola N, Alves A: Uncertainty in the quantification of pentachlorophenol in wood processing wastewaters by SPME-GC-MS. J Anal Chem 2011, 66: 756–762. doi:10.1134/S1061934811080053 10.1134/S1061934811080053View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Buhr K, van Ruth S, Delahunty C: Analysis of volatile flavour compounds by Proton Transfer Reaction-Mass Spectrometry: fragmentation patterns and discrimination between isobaric and isomeric compounds. Int J Mass Spectrom 2002, 221: 1–7. doi:10.1016/S1387–3806(02)00896–5 10.1016/S1387-3806(02)00896-5View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bunge M, Araghipour N, Mikoviny T, Dunkl J, Schnitzhofer R, Hansel A, Schinner F, Wisthaler A, Margesin R, Mark TD: On-Line Monitoring of Microbial Volatile Metabolites by Proton Transfer Reaction-Mass Spectrometry. Appl Environ Microbiol 2008, 74: 2179–2186. doi:<p>10.1128/AEM.02069–07</p> 10.1128/AEM.02069-07PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ezra D, Jasper J, Rogers T, Knighton B, Grimsrud E, Strobel G: Proton transfer reaction-mass spectrometry as a technique to measure volatile emissions of Muscodor albus. Plant Sci 2004, 166: 1471–1477. doi:16/j.plantsci.2004.01.022 10.1016/j.plantsci.2004.01.022View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Griffin MA, Spakowicz DJ, Gianoulis TA, Strobel SA: Volatile organic compound production by organisms in the genus Ascocoryne and a re-evaluation of myco-diesel production by NRRL 50072. Microbiology 2010, 156: 3814–3829. doi:10.1099/mic.0.041327–0 10.1099/mic.0.041327-0View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kai M, Crespo E, Cristescu SM, Harren FJM, Francke W, Piechulla B: Serratia odorifera: analysis of volatile emission and biological impact of volatile compounds on Arabidopsis thaliana. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2010, 88: 965–976. doi:10.1007/s00253–010–2810–1 10.1007/s00253-010-2810-1View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Karl T, Yeretzian C, Jordan A, Lindinger W: Dynamic measurements of partition coefficients using proton-transfer-reaction mass spectrometry (PTR-MS). Int J Mass Spectrom 2003, 223–224: 383–395. doi:10.1016/S1387–3806(02)00927–2View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- King J, Mochalski P, Kupferthaler A, Unterkofler K, Koc H, Filipiak W, Teschl S, Hinterhuber H, Amann A: Dynamic profiles of volatile organic compounds in exhaled breath as determined by a coupled PTR-MS/GC-MS study. Physiol Meas 2010, 31: 1169–1184. doi:10.1088/0967–3334/31/9/008 10.1088/0967-3334/31/9/008View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ladygina N, Dedyukhina EG, Vainshtein MB: A review on microbial synthesis of hydrocarbons. Process Biochem 2006, 41: 1001–1014. doi:10.1016/j.procbio.2005.12.007 10.1016/j.procbio.2005.12.007View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Langenfeld JJ, Hawthorne SB, Miller DJ: Quantitative Analysis of Fuel-Related Hydrocarbons in Surface Water and Wastewater Samples by Solid-Phase Microextraction. Anal Chem 1996, 68: 144–155. doi:10.1021/ac950862w 10.1021/ac950862wView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lindinger W, Hansel A, Jordan A: On-line monitoring of volatile organic compounds at pptv levels by means of proton-transfer-reaction mass spectrometry (PTR-MS) medical applications, food control and environmental research. Int J Mass Spectrom 1998, 173: 191–241. doi:10.1016/S0168–1176(97)00281–4 10.1016/S0168-1176(97)00281-4View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Linstrom PJ, Mallard WG (Eds): NIST Chemistry WebBook, NIST Standard Reference Database Number 69In National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg MD, 20899; 2011. [http://webbook.nist.gov]
- Maleknia S, Bell T, Adams M: PTR-MS analysis of reference and plant-emitted volatile organic compounds. Int J Mass Spectrom 2007, 262: 203–210. doi:10.1016/j.ijms.2006.11.010 10.1016/j.ijms.2006.11.010View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mallouchos A, Komaitis M, Koutinas A, Kanellaki M: Investigation of Volatiles Evolution during the Alcoholic Fermentation of Grape Must Using Free and Immobilized Cells with the Help of Solid Phase Microextraction (SPME) Headspace Sampling. J Agr Food Chem 2002, 50: 3840–3848. doi:10.1021/jf0116092 10.1021/jf0116092View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Parkerton TF, Stone MA, Letinski DJ: Assessing the aquatic toxicity of complex hydrocarbon mixtures using solid phase microextraction. Toxicol Lett 2000, 112–113: 273–282. doi:16/S0378–4274(99)00237–4View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pawliszyn J (Ed): Applications of solid phase microextraction The Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge; 1999.
- Pawliszyn J: Solid Phase Microextraction: Theory and Practice. Wiley-VCH, New York; 1997.Google Scholar
- Ramirez KS, Lauber CL, Fierer N: Microbial consumption and production of volatile organic compounds at the soil-litter interface. Biogeochemistry 2009, 99: 97–107. doi:10.1007/s10533–009–9393-xView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Robinson AL, Boss PK, Heymann H, Solomon PS, Trengove RD: Development of a sensitive non-targeted method for characterizing the wine volatile profile using headspace solid-phase microextraction comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography time-of-flight mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr A 2011, 1218: 504–517. doi:16/j.chroma.2010.11.008 10.1016/j.chroma.2010.11.008View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ruth V, M S, Lonneke D, Eugenio A, Sachiko O: Comparison of Volatile Flavour Profiles of Kidney Beans and Soybeans by GC-MS and PTR-MS. Food Sci Technol Res 2005, 11: 63–70. 10.3136/fstr.11.63View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sander R: "Henry's Law Constants" in NIST Chemistry WebBook, NIST Standard Reference Database Number 69.In Edited by: Linstrom P.J, Mallard W.G. National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg MD, 20899; 2011. [http://webbook.nist.gov]Google Scholar
- Solomons TWG, Fryhle CB: Organic Chemistry [Book]. Wiley, New York, New York; 2002.Google Scholar
- Steeghs M: Proton-Transfer-Reaction Mass Spectrometry as a New Tool for Real Time Analysis of Root-Secreted Volatile Organic Compounds in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 2004, 135: 47–58. doi:10.1104/pp. 104.038703 10.1104/pp.104.038703PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Strobel GA, Knighton B, Kluck K, Ren Y, Livinghouse T, Griffin M, Spakowicz D, Sears J: The production of myco-diesel hydrocarbons and their derivatives by the endophytic fungus Gliocladium roseum (NRRL 50072). Microbiology 2008, 154: 3319–3328. doi:10.1099/mic.0.2008/022186–0 10.1099/mic.0.2008/022186-0View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Strobel GA, Knighton B, Kluck K, Ren Y, Livinghouse T, Griffin M, Spakowicz D, Sears J: The production of myco-diesel hydrocarbons and their derivatives by the endophytic fungus Gliocladium roseum (NRRL 50072). Microbiology 2010, 156: 3830–3833. doi:10.1099/mic.0.30824–0 10.1099/mic.0.30824-0View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tomsheck AR, Strobel GA, Booth E, Geary B, Spakowicz D, Knighton B, Floerchinger C, Sears J, Liarzi O, Ezra D: Hypoxylon sp., an Endophyte of Persea indica, Producing 1,8-Cineole and Other Bioactive Volatiles with Fuel Potential. Microb Ecol 2010, 60: 903–914. doi:10.1007/s00248–010–9759–6 10.1007/s00248-010-9759-6View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Weldegergis BT, Crouch AM, Górecki T, de Villiers A: Solid phase extraction in combination with comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography coupled to time-of-flight mass spectrometry for the detailed investigation of volatiles in South African red wines. Anal Chim Acta 2011, 701: 98–111. doi:16/j.aca.2011.06.006 10.1016/j.aca.2011.06.006View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wercinski SAS (Ed): Solid phase microextraction - a practical guide CRC Press; 1999.Google Scholar
- Yaws CL: Chemical Properties Handbook. McGraw-Hill; 1999.Google Scholar
- Zeng EY, Noblet JA: Theoretical Considerations on the Use of Solid-Phase Microextraction with Complex Environmental Samples. Environ Sci Technol 2002, 36: 3385–3392. doi:10.1021/es025653p 10.1021/es025653pView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.